Give the Palisades Dog Park a Chance
When the search for a dedicated dog park in Pacific Palisades began focusing on the infamous Occidental site along PCH, just west of Potrero Canyon, we had mixed reactions. On the down side, we recognized that the two-acre site would pose numerous problems: overlapping jurisdiction between Caltrans and the L.A. Department of Recreation and Parks, the constant din of traffic, and the difficulty of driving down there from the Palisades. But we also knew that this rather forlorn location not only could be transformed into a landscaped dog park with ample room for parking, it was so far removed from any residential neighborhood, how could anybody possibly object? Well, naturally, we were wrong to underestimate how strongly Palisades homeowners will react to any perceived threat to their tranquility, as evidenced by the first letter in this week’s Letters to the Editor column. The author is a resident along Via de la Olas, the street that runs for five blocks along the bluffs directly above the proposed site, and her complaints have been reflected in a flurry of e-mails that surfaced from other residents in that area this past week. The battle began when Linda Renaud’s January 8 story (“Palisadians Dogged in Park Quest”) quoted Norm Kulla, acting chairman of the dog-park search committee, as suggesting that “Ideally, people would be able to access the site on foot from Temescal Canyon, the top of Potrero Canyon and the bluffs at Via de las Olas. There would also be car access from PCH.” This innocent observation drew a predictable response from neighbors, who envisioned swarms of dog owners parking along the Via bluffs and walking down the switchback trail to the dog park. By week’s end they were clamoring not only for preferential parking along Friends, Lombard, Swarthmore, Via de la Paz, Beirut and Mt. Holyoke, but urging one another to do whatever possible to stop the dog park from ever happening. This is a distressing turn of events that should never happen, and it won’t happen if the neighbors who are up in arms will realize that their objections are fueled by misconceptions and a lack of information. ??First of all, if the dog park location can indeed receive approval by whoever actually owns the land (the state or the city), a parking lot will be built adjacent to the park. ??Second, a fence will be built to ensure that dogs don’t chase rabbits or one another out onto PCH. ??Third, accessing the park along the roadway from Temescal Canyon shouldn’t bother anyone except the homeless who now try to live hidden away in the thick brush, and the one-mile hike from the Recreation Center down through Potrero Canyon to PCH will be too daunting for most people, especially those who simply want to let their dog run free every day or two. So that leaves the existing Via de las Olas trail that begins at Lombard and winds down to the highway. Here again, only the hearty dog owner will want to venture that time-consuming option, especially when he or she can simply drive down to the dog park (even though it means bucking PCH traffic). In reality, the Occidental site is the final option for dog-park advocates in this community. After studying and rejecting more than a half-dozen other possible locations, the search committee should be free to negotiate with various city departments and state agencies to work out a plan for this last patch of land-and they shouldn’t have to worry about fighting off the distant neighbors.